(By Pius Vilakati, writing as Mr Pius Rinto)
Introduction
Introduction
All
members of the People’s United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO) grow up with the
knowledge that there is an unbreakable historical alliance between PUDEMO and
the African National Congress (ANC). This teaching has come under immense
scrutiny especially from young comrades. We have seen some of these younger
members of PUDEMO going to the extent of openly advocating for political
parties that are opposed to the ANC in South Africa and daily alleging that the
ANC has sold out its own friends in the Swaziland struggle. These comrades
allege that the ANC has chosen to act ignorant on the brutalities committed by
the royal regime of Swaziland.
Brief
History of the alliance
[ALSO READ: Umkhonto
weSizwe (MK) in exile – Swaziland]
PUDEMO
was officially born in 1983. Before that year underground ANC cadres who were
based in Swaziland worked together with other Swazi nationals in the struggle
against apartheid and in the organising of the trade union movement in
Swaziland. As such, there are many unsung Swazi heroes who fought in the
struggle against apartheid, some of whom even went to exile with the ANC. In
the years leading to the launch of PUDEMO the relationship between the ANC and
Swazi comrades became cemented. PUDEMO was formed by Swazi comrades in unity with
South Africa’s ANC comrades.
Towards
the end of the 1980s the PUDEMO-ANC alliance was so strong that the Royal
regime in Swaziland was more willing to cooperate with the South African
apartheid regime when it wanted to arrest or murder some important ANC cadres
who were based in Swaziland. Some of the Swazi comrades had to go to exile,
escaping from both oppressive regimes. The maintenance of this alliance meant
that if any of the two movements attained freedom before the other, this would
present fertile ground for the one which would not have attained freedom to
find root in the independent state. Thus, for example, if PUDEMO had attained
freedom before the ANC could, PUDEMO would be duty-bound, in strict
revolutionary terms, to assist the ANC in its fight against the apartheid
regime, and vice-versa.
The
ANC- King Sobhuza II alliance
It is
important to mention at this point that the ANC did have a strategic alliance
with King Sobhuza II, such alliance having commenced during the reign of Queen
Regent Labotsibeni, to such an extent that Sobhuza had an ANC membership card.
ANC leadership would sometimes send delegations to Sobhuza to meet with him and
discuss important issues with an aim to strengthen their strategic alliance.
This alliance was, in my view, important for the ANC, for at that time South
Africa was surrounded mostly by colonies such as Mozambique (Independence:
1975.), Angola (Independence: 1975), and Namibia (formerly South West Africa –
Independence: 1990). Thus, it became important for the ANC to have at least a
temporary strategic alliance with the independent Swaziland state (Independence
1968). This strategic alliance also made sense because they had a common enemy:
colonialism.
Post
1994
PUDEMO
members must have understandably believed that when South Africa had its first
democratic elections in 1994, especially with an expected ANC victory,
Swaziland would immediately follow and attain democracy. In 1994 I was too
young to understand the mood of our PUDEMO comrades, but it must have evoked
some spirit of freedom from within them. This, sadly, was not to be. South
Africa celebrates twenty years of democracy this year, whilst Swaziland, on the
other hand, seems too far from freedom and the ANC seems neutral on the
struggle for freedom in Swaziland.
The
ANC has had three presidents since 1994. Some of our comrades claim that
President Jacob Zuma will never speak out against the
Swaziland regime because he is directly related to King Mswati III. It is
public knowledge that Zuma was given a woman, Princess Sebentile, as a gift
from the Swazi royal family, to marry, although he now seems reluctant to
officially marry her. Thus, Zuma is King Mswati’s brother-in-law. Princess
Sebentile is King Zobhuza II’s daughter. Further, it is believed by many
people, some of our own comrades included, that Zuma received great help,
specifically in the form of muthi, which helped him beat the
academically-decorated former president, Thabo Mbeki, in the 2007
ANC elective congress in Polokwane. It is true that on the years leading to
that congress Zuma was in and out of Swaziland, in most instances the Swazi
media choosing not to report on the visits or the reasons for those visits.
With these facts in mind, some of our comrades are convinced that in order for
our struggle to make greater progress, Zuma must vacate the presidency.
I do
not entirely agree with my comrades’ narrative, however. Firstly, none of the
previous two presidents, Thabo Mbeki and Nelson Mandela, has ever
publicly condemned the Royal regime for its atrocities. In most cases it was
just praises for King Mswati, with Mandela being the main culprit here. Mandela
went to Swaziland and publicly proclaimed, in praising King Mswati, that the
king was not just a king for the Swazis but also a king for all people in
Southern Africa (Ingonyama akusiyo nje yamaSwati kuphela. Ingonyama eyethu
nathi sonke eMzansi Afrika).
Secondly,
Mandela is also related to King Mswati. His eldest daughter, Zenani, married
Swaziland’s Prince Thembumuzi, a son of the late King Sobhuza II, in 1973.
Zenani is still known in Swaziland with the title “Her Royal Highness” due to
that marriage, although she has separated from her Swazi husband. Therefore,
Mandela and Zuma find themselves in the same pot. Thabo Mbeki never condemned
nor praised King Mswati. He was forever silent until the last days of his
presidency when he committed the utmost blunder of visiting Swaziland.
There
are many other reasons why I disagree with the above-mentioned anti-Zuma
narrative. The main thing is that since 1994 none of the presidents has
actually come out to condemn the regime. In fact one must boldly state that the
greatest progress that has been seen in the ANC with regard to our struggle has
been under President Zuma’s presidency. In the Mangaung conference in 2012, for
instance, the ANC resolved to not only support the struggle for Swaziland’s
democracy, but went on to form a special committee that would concentrate on
the democratisation of Swaziland. Well, the fact that the committee is
toothless and filled with too many pro-monarchy members is an issue for another
day.
ANC in
business with King Mswati III
[ALSO READ: ANC
Conflicted on Swaziland: Can it be trusted?]
Today
we have all accepted that the ANC is in business with King Mswati. Sadly, some
of our comrades would not like to see us raising this issue repeatedly. They
must close their eyes and ears, or better yet shut down their brains! I wonder
what they stand to gain in this evil business partnership. The ANC, through its
investment wing, Chancellor House, owns a large part of Maloma Colliery,
with the other part being owned by King Mswati’s Tibiyo Taka Ngwane.
Practically this means the ANC is in bed with King Mswati. All their business
partnerships are simply about profit, bigger profit and more super-profits. All
this happens at the expense of the oppressed people of Swaziland and the
liberation struggle as a whole, whilst they proclaim the now-tired diplomatic
phrase, “we will not interfere into the internal affairs of another sovereign
state.”
It is
known that many other rich ANC cadres do visit Swaziland and even go on to play
golf with King Mswati. They even enjoy exclusive dinner with him in his extravagant
palaces. No political program is ever attached to their visits. It is just
great friends visiting one of their own great friends on great days. Some ANC
comrades, such as Siphiwe Nyanda, have even supplied the regime’s army with
guns and ammunition which the regime has proceeded to use for the murder of our
comrades. Some ANC comrades make it a point to visit Swaziland during the
Marula season and drink with Mswati whilst some prefer to take part during the
reed dance ceremony. At one point Baleka Mbethe also took part in the Marula
celebrations at Buhleni Royal Kraal, where she was also able to secretly meet
and discuss with the king and other government officials such as Mr Lutfo
Dlamini. At another point, Julius Malema, then an ANCYL president, visited
Swaziland. He was reported by the Swazi media to have been on a tour of
Swaziland and was later caught by the Royal Swaziland Police for drunken
driving. He had gone to Swaziland to have some nice time with his
Swaziland-based friends. Just like his elders’ visits, there was no political
program attached to his visit as well.
Additionally,
the ANC-led government has a deal with the autocratic regime of Swaziland to
have a rail-line operating from South Africa, which will go through Swaziland
and reach Richards Bay, a business venture aimed at cutting costs for the South
African government. None of the projects being carried out either by the ANC or
individual ANC cadres or the ANC-led government have any political program
attached to them. None of them is of any benefit to PUDEMO or the struggle.
They are all about business and making as much profit as possible for the ANC,
the ANC-led government and some individual ANC comrades.
The
ANC is today in warm blankets and comfortable bed with the brutal royal regime.
It is as if they have forgotten about the people of Swaziland’s role in the
South African liberation struggle. It appears as if they have forgotten the
historical alliance between PUDEMO and the ANC. The myth that Swazi exiles
receive refugees’ status in South Africa because of the existence of an
ANC-PUDEMO alliance must be debunked. It is international law, not any
PUDEMO-ANC alliance, which forces the South African government to issue
refugees’ status to Swaziland exiles. If it were due to the alliance, then that
would mean the ANC is also in alliance with Zimbabwe’s MDC and other opposition
parties in countries such as Angola, Pakistan, Iraq, DRC, etc, as well. The
truth is that Swazi exiles receive refugees’ status because there is a political
crisis in Swaziland, a crisis which is well-acknowledged by the international
community. Even people who are not members of PUDEMO have received such
refugee’ status.
The
relationship that the ANC has with the royal regime has muddied the PUDEMO-ANC
alliance. Thus, whatever resolutions the ANC has taken in the past, when one
views the relationship that it has with King Mswati, it becomes clear that
those resolutions were nothing but cold water on the back of a duck. The ANC
gives us hope whilst at the same time taking away the little hope that we have.
This year PUDEMO was invited by the ANC-led government to president Zuma’s
inauguration at the Union Buildings. All this was being done, in my view, to
keep us quiet about the Mswati-ANC seemingly unbreakable relationship. I dare
say that if Swazi guerrillas could attack King Mswati and aim to overthrow his
regime by the barrel of the gun, the ANC-led government would interfere and
attempt to save the monarch, partly in order to save its own economic interests,
despite the non-interference rhetoric!
Conclusion
It is
sad that a revolutionary alliance that had a great promise has disintegrated to
such levels. Some Swazi comrades seem to have given up on the struggle because
of such a seemingly-dead alliance. If there is any life in this alliance it is
important that drastic measures are taken to energize it. As things stand, the
ANC looks like any of the other political parties in South Africa in so far as
the struggle for freedom in Swaziland is concerned.
If it
is not possible to resuscitate the PUDEMO-ANC alliance, then we should remove
the wool in our eyes and start opening up to the fact that we no longer have an
alliance and instead start treating the ANC as just one of the organisations of
the world from which we can accept any kind of assistance, but with the
knowledge that they are not our friends. We should wake up to the fact that
they will not stand with us when it matters the most. As things stand the
alliance looks dead!
An insightfull view from the inside, mind openning questions raised.
ReplyDelete